Recently,
there’s been a lot of talk about the legislation
that the Charest government pushed through just before
Christmas, muzzling all opposition.
Let’s take a look at what it all means. What
are some of these infamous pieces of legislation?
The explanatory sketches below are adapted, in part,
from a number of documents put together by the CSN.
It’s our job to understand and analyse them.
We have to stop believing that the State is a tool
for establishing a sort of equity or just relationship
between workers and their employers. We have to stop
believing that the State is created BY us and FOR
us.
State
is a tool used by the powerful (capitalists) that
institutionalizes and legalizes relationships of domination
and exploitation. The State legislates and regulates
our exploitation. The people who direct the workings
of the State are politicians and high-ranking bureaucrats.
Watch carefully what sort of decisions they make.
Look carefully at who they’re in bed with. And
observe how they live, eat, travel and take vacations.
Watch who they marry and with whom they have children.
Notice where they live.
It
is necessary to understand the interests of those
who direct the State. Look at the decisions they are
making and draw your own conclusions.
Bill
31
This
piece of legislation modified the Labor Code regulations
that apply when a part of a business’s activities
are handed over to another party.
workers in a business decide to unionize and to negotiate
their work conditions, they don’t want their
jobs and their work conditions to be able to be overturned
by means of a simple reorganization of the business.
That
is exactly what Article 45 of the Quebec’s Labor
Code guarantees. It protects the exercise of workers’
fundamental right to associate in order to form a
union and to negotiate their work conditions.
Thus,
if the employer transfers all or a part of its activities
to another business, the union accreditation and the
work conditions remain unchanged.
But Bill 31 stipulated that if a business transfers
part of its activities to a sub-contractor without
also selling its equipment, machinery, know-how—in
short, without transferring “most of its characteristic
elements”—article 45 no longer applies.
The
union accreditation no longer covers those jobs. The
work conditions that have been negotiated cease to
exist. The sub-contractor can do as it please!
The legislation also eliminated any requirement that
the employer advise the union that it intends to transfer
activities to a sub-contractor.
In
cases where Article 45 still applies, the union will
be preserved but the collective agreement will be
rendered null and void as soon as the concession of
activities is made.
Workers
can now find out one morning that they’ve changed
employers and that the employer has the right to decide
what their work conditions will be.
Whether it is the sub-contracting out of mechanical
maintenance, house keeping, kitchens or cafeterias,
laundering services, machining or assembly process,
transport, snow or garbage removal—as long as
there is no transfer of equipment or vehicles, there
will no longer be a union or negotiated work conditions
for those workers.
We
can take a simple example. Say the management of a
hospital center wants to sub-contract out its cafeteria
service. The management only has to sell its service
without selling the cafeteria equipment for the conditions
of Article 45 of the Labor Code to no longer apply.
Simply put, that means that the sub-contractor who
will have purchased the cafeteria service will be
under no obligation to hire the unionized staff already
doing the job, to maintain their work conditions or
pay them the same salary. Easy as pie. There is no
transfer of equipment, so Article 45 doesn’t
apply. The sub-contractor can move in with its equipment
and its personnel—and out go the unionized workers!
With
Bill 31, the government gave business a tool to keep
unions from forming or to break existing unions. What’s
more, the government gave bosses the tools they need
to put a downward pressure on work conditions.
